Experience of recording qualifying features of a crime in the Commonwealth of Independent States countries
https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-7306-2025-1-1-130-137
EDN: FHILWL
Abstract
Purpose. Conducting a comparative analysis of the qualifying features of crimes in states with a common historical, cultural and civilizational path.
Materials and methods. In the context of deglobalization and regionalization of international law, emphasis is placed on the Model Criminal Code for the CIS member states, as well as the Criminal Codes of such republics friendly to Russia as Azerbaijan, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan.
Results. The structural and substantive features of recording the qualifying features of crimes in the above-mentioned legal acts are considered. Specific examples of description of these features are identified in comparison with the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. The original structuring of the relevant legislative material is implemented in the Criminal Code of the Republic of Belarus: qualifying features in a number of cases are listed in an alternative way (without highlighting points). In turn, in the Criminal Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan, a "splitting" of a single feature into separate points is revealed. In terms of content, exclusive legislative decisions are the recognition of the increased public danger of theft with illegal entry into a vehicle, as well as violation of privacy using a remotely controlled unmanned aerial vehicle. The experience of differentiating criminal liability depending on the forms of complicity in a crime, type of recidivism and the type of intent deserves attention.
Conclusions. Based on the "classic" set of qualifying elements of crimes in the Model Criminal Code for the CIS member states, legislators from different countries have independently optimized their description.
The similarity of the general approaches of legislators to the establishment of qualifying signs has been revealed; the assessment of the degree of their public danger, as well as the list of crimes in individual components, vary.
The differentiation of criminal liability at the level of qualifying elements of a crime in the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation should be carried out taking into account not only positive foreign experience, but also the achievements of domestic criminal law doctrine.
About the Author
V. V. BagaevRussian Federation
Vladimir V. Bagaev – applicant of the Department of Criminal Law and Criminology, Deputy Head of the Department for Supervision of Investigation, Inquiry and Operational-Investigative Activities – Head of the Department for Supervision of Investigation in Investigative Bodies of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation, Justice Advisor
Krasnodar
References
1. Motin A. V. On Some Issues of Differentiation of Criminal Liability for Crimes against the Person by Means of Qualifying Features. Issues of Russian and International Law. 2020;10 (7-1):127–141. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.34670/AR.2020.57.97.017
2. Konyakhin V. P., Poltavets V. V. Punitive Arsenal of Modern International Criminal Law. Actual Problems of Theory and Practice of Criminal Law and Procedure in Modern Conditions: Proceedings of the III International Scientific and Practical Conference. Donetsk: 2023. Pp. 320–328. (In Russ.)
3. Russian Criminal Law. General Part: Textbook for Universities / edited by Doctor of Law, Professor, Honored Lawyer of the Russian Federation V. P. Konyakhin and Doctor of Law, Professor M. L. Prokhorova. Moscow; 2014. (In Russ.)
4. Dyadyun K.V. Regulation of liability for negligent causing of death: comparative legal analysis of the legislation of the CIS countries. International Journal of Humanities and Natural Sciences. 2023;11-1(86):83-88. (In Russ.)
5. Shipunova M. N. Deception as a method of committing a crime: problems of theory and practice. Asia-Pacific region: economics, politics, law. 2024;26(3):169–181. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24866/1813-3274/2024-3/169-181
6. Kochoi S. M. Criminal-legal risks of using unmanned vehicles. Actual problems of Russian law. 2021; 16 (7(128)):125–135. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2021.128.7.125-135
7. Kamalova G. G. Some issues of criminal liability in the field of application of artificial intelligence systems and robotics. Bulletin of Udmurt University. 2020;30(3):382–388. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.35634/2412-9593-2020-30-3-382-388
8. Aslanyan R. G. Differentiation of responsibility and systematization of the provisions of the special part of criminal law. Legal Bulletin of the Kuban State University. 2022;(3):87–94. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.31429/20785836-14-3-87-94.
Review
For citations:
Bagaev V.V. Experience of recording qualifying features of a crime in the Commonwealth of Independent States countries. North Caucasus Legal Vestnik. 2025;(1):130-137. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-7306-2025-1-1-130-137. EDN: FHILWL
