Preview

North Caucasus Legal Vestnik

Advanced search

The lack of dialogue between Emperor Nicholas II and the Russian society to be the reason for the collapse of the monarchy in February 1917

https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-7306-2023-1-2-32-41

Abstract

Debates about the role of Nicholas II in the Russian history bring about an issue of whether the Emperor facilitated or retarded the development of Russia. Emigrants and Soviet historians contemporary with the February Revolution had a prevailing opinion that it was the Emperor's refusal to cooperate with the society and attempts to solve vital problems resorting to “reforms from above” that led to “revolutions from beneath. In the recent years, a number of authors have written that both on the initiative and under the leadership of Nicholas II, modernization of all spheres of the society kept a rapid pace. It was not the Tsar who hindered the development of the country but the society represented by the State Duma and the State Council (too slow to consider the Emperor’s bills).Besides, external and internal cataclysms (wars and revolutions) hindered the transformational activity of Nicholas II and the country's progress. The purpose of the article is to analyze the attitude of Nicholas II to the idea of transferring some of his powers to society, namely, the State Duma.

About the Author

A. G. Danilov
South-Russian Institute of Management – branch of Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Russian Federation

Andrey G. Danilov Doctor of Historical Sciences, Professor of Department of Theory and History of Law and State of South-Russian Institute of Management – branch of RANEPA

Rostov-on-Don

 



References

1. Mironov B. N. The Russian Empire: from Traditionto Modernity. Vol. I–III. 2nd ed. St. Petersburg; 2018. (In Russ.)

2. Mironov B. N. Russian modernization and revolution. St. Petersburg; 2019. 528 p. (In Russ.)

3. Kulikov S. V. Emperor Nicholas II as a reformer: to the formulation of the problem. Russian History. 2009;(4):45-60. (In Russ.)

4. Kulikov S. V. Was Nicholas II a conservative? Political views of the last autocrat and his political ritual. Questions of History. 2020;11(2):4-28. (In Russ.)

5. Kulikov S. V. The reformatory project of Nicholas II. Regularity as a factor of the state activity of the last autocrat. Questions of history. 2020;12(3):93–119. (In Russ.)

6. Stavka and Revolution. The Headquarters of the Supreme Commander–in-Chief and the revolutionary events of 1917 early 1918. According to the documents of the Russian State Military Historical Archive: Collection of documents: In 2 vol. Vol. 1. February 18 June 18, 1917 / ed. by I. O. Garkusha. Moscow; 2019. (In Russ.)

7. The fall of the tsarist regime: Verbatim reports of interrogations and testimony given in 1917, in the Extraordinary Investigative Commission of the Provisional Government / ed. P.E. Shchegolev. Vol. 1-7. Moscow-Leningrad; 1924-1927. (In Russ.)

8. Andreev D. A. How dreams from “mad” became “meaningless”: to the history of the speech of Emperor Nicholas II on January 17, 1895. Bulletin of the Volgograd State University. Episode 4: History. Regional studies. International relations. 2011;2(20):36-44. (In Russ.)

9. Erlikhman V. V. Population losses in the XX century. Reference book. Moscow; 2004. 176 p. (In Russ.)

10. Schwanebach P. H. Notes of a dignitary. The politics of P. A. Stolypin and the Second State Duma / Elections to the I–IV State Duma of the Russian Empire. (Memoirs of contemporaries. Materials and documents) / Under total. scientific ed. A.V. Ivanchenko. Moscow; 2008. (In Russ.)

11. Letter of Nicholas II to N. A. Maklakov. October 18, 1913 / Monarchy before the crash. 1914 – 1917. Papers of Nicholas II and other documents. Moscow-Leningrad; 1927. (In Russ.)

12. Correspondence of Nicholas and Alexandra Romanov. 1914-1917, vol. III–V. Moscow-Leningrad;19231927. (In Russ.)

13. Kokovtsov V. N. From my past. Memories. 1903-1919. Vol. II. Paris, 1933. (In Russ.)

14. Grand Duke. Alexander Mikhailovich. Memoirs in two books. Moscow: Zakharov; 2017. (In Russ.)

15. Danilov A. G. Who "betrayed" whom in February 1917? North Caucasus Legal Vestnik. 2019;(4):37-44. (In Russ.)

16. Danilov A. G. Departure of Emperor Nicholas II from Petrograd on February 22, 1917 as a factor of the collapse of the monarchy. State and Municipal Management. Scholar Notes. 2021;(4):163-171. (In Russ.)

17. Rodzianko M. V. The Collapse of the Empire. Leningrad; 1929. (In Russ.)

18. Danilov A. G. The actions of the authorities in Petrograd on February 23 – 28, 1917: some lessons North Caucasus Legal Vestnik. 2021;(3):36-58. (In Russ.)

19. The Abdication of Nicholas II: Eyewitness Memoirs, documents. Moscow; 1998. (In Russ.)

20. Protocol of the events of the February Revolution / February Revolution 1917. Collection of documents and materials. Moscow; 1996. (In Russ.)

21. Diaries of Nicholas II and Empress Alexandra Feodorovna: in 2 volumes. / ed., comp. V. M. Khrushchev. Moscow; 2012. Vol. 1. (In Russ.)

22. Lukomsky A. S. Essays from my life. Memoirs. Moscow; 2012. (In Russ.)

23. Ruzsky N. V. The stay of Nicholas II in Pskov on March 1 and 2, 1917. (Conversation with Gen. S. N. Vilchkovsky). In: The abdication of Nicholas II. Memoirs of eyewitnesses, documents / ed. by P. E. Shchegolev. Reprint of the Moscow publishing House: Soviet Writer; 1990. (In Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Danilov A.G. The lack of dialogue between Emperor Nicholas II and the Russian society to be the reason for the collapse of the monarchy in February 1917. North Caucasus Legal Vestnik. 2023;(2):32-41. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-7306-2023-1-2-32-41

Views: 6


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2074-7306 (Print)
ISSN 2687-0304 (Online)