Canon law of the Eastern Roman Empire as a historical source of domestic criminal law

The purpose of this work is to refute the point of view of a number of theorists about the legal "backwardness" and programmed implementation doom of domestic public (and, above all, criminal) law. In this article, the author declares and argues the thesis that domestic criminal law (Russian/Russian) was initially, from the moment of its formation, based on the traditions of classical Roman law in its most developed Byzantine form. The reception of Roman law into Russian criminal law was carried out in two directions: canon law and secular law. And if the vector of Byzantine influence on the development of secular criminal law has faded over time, then canon law continues to test it to this day. As a result, the author substantiates the conclusion that understanding the true historical roots of the formation of domestic law forms the foundation for its development at the moment and frees the reform of Russian criminal law from artificially imposed dependence on the trends of development of European public law.

1. Kravchenko E. V. Influence of Byzantine legal norms on legal monuments of Ancient Russia. Philosophy of Law. 2014:120–123. (In Russ)

2. Bondarenko Yu. V. On the problem of reception of Byzantine law in ancient Russian legislation. Gaps in Russian legislation. 2010;(4):274–276. (In Russ.)

3. Miller G. F. On the origin of the name and people of Russia. In: Lomonosov: the Genius of Russian history. Edited by V.V.Fomin. Moscow: Russian panorama; 2006. (In Russ.)

4. Efimovskikh V. L. Religious crimes in Russian law of the X – early XX century. Dis. for the degree of uch. step. Candidate of Law. Nizhny Novgorod; 2002. (In Russ.)

5. Klimov A. Yu. The influence of the Greek Nomocanon on Russian secular legislation in line with Church-state relations: the End – middle of the XVII centuries. Dissertation on the soic. uch. step. Ph.D., 2006. (In Russ.)

6. Stradanchenkov A. S. Ancient Roman and Byzantine lessons of legislation and its continuity with Russian culture (philosophical and cultural vzglyad). Bulletin of the Ud-Murt University. Philosophy. Sociology. Psychology. Pedagogy. 2012;(1):77-90. (In Russ.)

7. Pavlov A. S. Course of Church law. Sergiev Posad. Publishing house of the Holy Trinity Lavra. 1902. (In Russ.)

8. Vershinin K. V. The measure of righteousness in the history of Ancient Russian literature and law. Moscow, St. Petersburg: Nestor-History; 2019. (In Russ.)

9. Rybin I. V. The Origins of the criminal law of Ancient Russia: the influence of the Christian Byzantine criminal law tradition. Bulletin of the Ural Institute of Economics, Management and Law. The Law series. 2011;(2):10–13. (In Russ.)

10. Engels F. Peasant war in Germany. In: Marx K., Engels. F. Soch. Vol. 7. (In Russ.)

11. Popov A. Trial and punishment for crimes against faith and morality under Russian Law. Type. Imp. Un-ta. Kazan; 1904. (In Russ.)

12. Ikonnikov V. S. The experience of Russian historiography. Vol. 1, part 1, type. Un-ta. Kiev; 1891. (In Russ.)

13. Shchapov Ya. N. Byzantine and South Slavic legal heritage in Russia in the XI-XIII centuries. Moscow: Nauka, 1978. (In Russ.)

14. Suvorov N. S. The question of the Nomocanon of John the Postnik in a new formulation. (About the book by A. S. Pavlov: "Nomocanon at the great Breviary". Yaroslavl: Type. E.G. Falka; 1898.(In Russ.)

15. Pavlov V. I. Anthropology of law in the context of legal, philosophical and religious traditions: the history of formation. Moscow: Yurlitinform, 2021. (In Russ.)

16. Sreznevsky I. I. The Pandects of Nikon the Montenegrin in the Old Russian translation of the XII century (legal texts). St. Petersburg: Type. Imp. Acad. Sciences, 1872. (In Russ.)

17. Eclogue. The Byzantine legislative code of the VIII century/trans., comment. E. E. Lipshits. Norma. Moscow; 1965. (In Russ.)

18. Sergievich V. I. Russian legal antiquities. In 4 t. t. 2. Type. N.A. Lebedev. St. Petersburg; 1900. (In Russ.)

19. Suvorov N. S. On church punishments. The experience of research on church law. Type. A. Tranchel. St. Petersburg; 1876. (In Russ.)

20. Georgievsky E. V. Church-criminal legislation of Byzantium in Russia and its influence on the formation of Russian Orthodox legislation. Siberian Legal Bulletin. Criminal law issues. 2007;3(38):29–37. (In Russ.)

21. Sidorkin A. I. Punishments related to deprivation and restriction of liberty in Russian criminal legislation of the IX–XVII centuries: Problems of legal regulation, systematization and application. Autoref. dis. on the job. d. s. n., Kazan. 2005. (In Russ.)

22. Penskaya T. M., Tonkov E. E., Turanin V.Yu. On the question of the nature of the reception of Byzantine law in medieval Russia. NOMOTHETIKA: Philosophy, sociology, law. 2020:45(4):761–774. (In Russ.)

23. Ershov V.V. Evolution and emanation of law: comparative analysis. Journal of Russian Law. 2023;27(5):65–74. (In Russ.)

24. Vladimirov-Budanov M. F. Review of the history of Russian law. Kiev; 1907. (In Russ.)

25. Shcherbatov M. M. On the damage of morals in Russia. St. Petersburg: Publishing House of Vrublevsky; 1906. (In Russ.)