Preview

North Caucasus Legal Vestnik

Advanced search

Judicial constitutionalism: new milestones after constitutional amendments

Abstract

Introduction. In a modern society in which the rights and freedoms of citizens are becoming increasingly important, it is necessary to understand how changes in legislation will affect the implementation and protection of these rights and freedoms, as well as the functioning of the judiciary as a whole. In this regard, the study of judicial constitutionalism in the context of the 2020 amendments is an urgent task that requires in-depth analysis and reflection.

Purpose. Analysis of judicial constitutionalism in the era of constitutional changes; changes in the powers of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, which makes it possible to assess the effectiveness of its work in the light of the implementation of new tasks.

Materials and methods. A theoretical analysis of the concept of "judicial constitutionalism", an analysis of various points of view of leading constitutional scholars on this issue, as well as an analysis of normative legal acts that address issues of judicial constitutionalism. The study covers the period before and after amendments to the Constitution of the Russian Federation, paying special attention to changes in the structure and functions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation.

Results. It is shown that the constitutional amendments of 2020 had a significant impact on the effectiveness of judicial constitutionalism. The article provides an overview analysis of the changed functions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation and changes in its competence. This makes it possible to assess how effectively the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation is coping with new tasks and how this affects its authority and independence.

Conclusions. The importance of judicial constitutionalism as an element of the protection of human and civil rights and freedoms, as well as its role in the formation of legal awareness in society, is emphasized. This article is aimed at a comprehensive study of judicial constitutionalism in the context of constitutional amendments, the results of which will allow not only to understand the current changes in the legal system, but also to identify possible directions for its further development.

About the Author

A. G. Kuzmin
South Ural State University (National Research University)
Russian Federation

Andrey G. Kuzmin – Dr. Sci. (Law), Professor of the Department of Constitutional and Administrative Law

Chelyabinsk



References

1. Zorkin V. D. Constitutional justice: meaning and procedure. Saint Petersburg, 2021. Available from: https://ksrf.ru/ru/News/Speech/Documents/Constitutional%20justice.pdf. (In Russ.)

2. Bondar N.S. Judicial constitutionalism in Russia in the light of constitutional justice. Moscow: Infra-M; 2011. 544 p. (In Russ.)

3. Aranovskiy K.V., Knyazev S.D. Russian constitutionalism: judicial, judicial, judicial ... Journal of Constitutional Justice. 2011;(3):30–38. (In Russ.)

4. Kravets I. A. On the concept of judicial constitutionalism. In: Legal problems of strengthening Russian statehood. Part 46. Edited by M.M. Zhuravlev, A.M. Barnashov, V.M. Zuev. Tomsk: National Research Tomsk State University; 2010:58–59. (In Russ.)

5. Bondar N. S. Russian judicial constitutionalism: an introduction to the methodology of research. Series "Library of Judicial Constitutionalism". Issue 1. Moscow: Formula prava; 2012. 106 p. (In Russ.)

6. Bondar N. S. From judicial constitutionalism to judicial law–making: doctrine and practice. In: Actual problems of law-making, law enforcement and socio-economic regulation: collection of articles. A. N. Ratkov, E. N. Gunina (eds). Rostov-on-Don: Sputnik nauki; 2024:6–31. (In Russ.)

7. Kokotov A. N. Judicial constitutionalism and constitutional justice. Journal of Russian Law. 2011;6(174):130–134. (In Russ.)

8. Kravets I. A. Constitutional justice. Theory of judicial constitutional law and practice of judicial constitutional process. Moscow: Justicinform; 2017. 400 p. (In Russ.)

9. Kravets I. A. Constituent power and judicial constitutionalism: theoretical approaches and constitutional reform in 2020. Journal of Constitutional Justice. 2022;(1):1–11. DOI: 10.18572/2072-4144-2022-1-1-11. (In Russ.)

10. Morshchakova T. Commentary on the conclusion of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation dated March 16, 2020. Available from: https://academia.ilpp.ru/kommentarij-k-zaklyucheniyu-konstitutsionnogo-suda-rossijskoj-federatsii/ (In Russ.)

11. Salenko A. V. Constitutional reform 2020 and judicial power: problems of independence and independence. Bulletin of the Tyumen State University. 2020;6(3(23)):188–211. (In Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Kuzmin A.G. Judicial constitutionalism: new milestones after constitutional amendments. North Caucasus Legal Vestnik. 2025;(2):34-40. (In Russ.)

Views: 1


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2074-7306 (Print)
ISSN 2687-0304 (Online)