On criminal liability for encroachment on the life of a state or public figure
https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-7306-2024-1-2-138-144
EDN: OVNDJQ
Abstract
In this article, the authors raise the issue of the criminal law assessment of an attack on the life of a state or public figure. The design of the elements of the offence provided for in article 277 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation is being analyzed. In the course of the legal analysis of the legal assessment of the above-mentioned socially dangerous act, it is emphasized that the main problem in the classification of this crime is the lack of normative enshrinement of the definitions of the terms «statesman», and «public figure», which makes the range of potential losses on this criminal act vague, in connection with which, the author’s proposal to supplement the said article of the Code with a note of the relevant content has been put forward.
Keywords
About the Authors
J. I. IsakovaRussian Federation
Julia I. Isakova - Dr. Sci. (Sociology), Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Dean of the Faculty of Law
Rostov-on-Don
E. V. Millerov
Russian Federation
Evgeny V. Millerov - Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Procedural Law; Associate Professor of the Department of Criminal Law and Public Law Disciplines
Rostov-on-Don
References
1. Paliy V. V. The object of crimes under Articles 277, 278 and 279 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation: problems of systematization. Bulletin of the O.E. Kutafin University (MGUA). 2018;12(52):113–120. (In Russ.)
2. Kapinus O. S., Nedelin I. G. Determinants of encroachments on the life of state or public figures: general and private. Modern law. 2008;(6-1):54–59. (In Russ.)
3. Nabiev M. A. Encroachment on the life of a state or public figure (Article 277 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation) as a terrorist crime. Bulletin of the Academy of the Prosecutor General's Office of the Russian Federation. 2015;6(50):122–126. (In Russ.)
4. Tikhonin I. A. The distinction between a terrorist act and an attack on the life of a state or public figure. Issues of Russian justice. 2022;(21):508–515. (In Russ.)
5. Petrishchev A. O. A state or public figure as a sign of a victim in the commission of a crime under Article 277 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation: features of qualification. In: "State and law: problems and prospects for improvement". Collection of scientific papers of the 4th International Scientific Conference. In 2 volumes. Kursk; 2021:326–330. (In Russ.)
6. Voronin V. N. Encroachment on the life of a statesman or public figure: problems of norm construction. Proceedings of Voronezh State University. Series: Law. 2017;(4):232–236. (In Russ.)
7. Degterev A. A. A statesman or a public figure: a criminal law concept. Actual problems of Russian law. 2020;15(5(114)):188–198. (In Russ.)
8. Reshetnikov A. Yu. Encroachment on the life of a state or public figure as a special case of criminalization of an unfinished crime. Legal Bulletin. 2018;(3):61–71. (In Russ.)
9. Aguzarov T. K. Encroachment on the life of a statesman or public figure: controversial issues of interpretation of the signs of composition. Lex Russica (Russian Law). 2012;71(6):1342–1361. (In Russ.)
10. Drobot S. A., Kulichkov A. A. The ratio of crimes provided for in Articles 360 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation and Articles 205, 213, 277 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. Criminal law. 2016;(1):23–30. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Isakova J.I., Millerov E.V. On criminal liability for encroachment on the life of a state or public figure. North Caucasus Legal Vestnik. 2024;(2):138-144. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-7306-2024-1-2-138-144. EDN: OVNDJQ
